News

Cape Town property valuations: an alternative viewpoint

Private Property South Africa
Press |
Cape Town property valuations: an alternative viewpoint

Referring to the article entitled ‘City is playing valuations games’ published on the 4 April by the Cape Argus, Swindon Property would like to address key factors and discuss opposing views written in this article.

It is our belief that the Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal system (CAMA) used by the City of Cape Town is very effective in some areas and a more transparent relationship between the City and property owners would have a positive impact on the valuation process.

The statement made by Mr Phillip Bam reads as follows:

“But the system that the City is using is really outdated and unfair. They use the market value of the properties and that in itself is a problem. The markets are affected by so many other factors. Let’s take an area like Grassy Park where the roads are not often maintained. Go to Constantia or Bishopscourt where roads are much better. Now the same system or formula is used for both areas. Now in certain respects the market values between areas are different, but that does not mean that the same system should be used for the City.”

With all due respect to Mr Bam, we would like to highlight some of our opposing views. Although the City’s system is not perfect, it does value the lower to middle-income neighbourhoods accurately. The reason for this, is that the value band in these neighbourhoods are small when compared to the upmarket neighbourhoods.

With this CAMA system, sales from the same area as the valued property are applied. In essence, if the roads are bad for the Property being valued, it impacts on the values derived by the sales applied by the City’s valuation system.

The problem is more evident in the upmarket areas. In these nodes, the value bands are quite broad. For example, a house of R5,000,000 could be situated adjacent to a house of R25,000,000. Should a few of the houses in the upper region of this parameter sell, this would impact heavily on the average rate per m² applied to this node.

For different reasons to Mr Bam, we consider the communication between departments within the City a problem more so than the system.

Our Valuations Division have first-hand experience for an excess of 20 years as well as being involved on both sides of the General Valuation, we have strong knowledge and thorough understanding of the system and the application thereof.

Where the City is lacking in our opinion, is the valuing the commercial sector. If this was undertaken in a more thorough manner, the burden would not be placed on the residential market to assist the City to make up their budget requirements.

When valuing the commercial sector, there are two impacting problems:

Firstly, there is a lack of communication between the building department and the valuations department. With daily valuation work, it is often noted that a property which was previously vacant and now redeveloped has not been revalued as an improved site. This affects income for the City.

Secondly, the method used to value commercial property is the same as residential property, this should not be the case. It may work to some degree for Sectional Title commercial sites but freehold cannot be valued on the same

method. There are too many factors to consider and this cannot be reflected in a common rate per m² indicated by this computerised system.

Impractical to value properties every year

The statement by Mr Johan van der Merwe, Mayco member for Finance, mentions that properties should be valued every year. This is not a practical solution as the City can barely cope with the General Valuations which take place every three years. Yearly valuations would not assist in resolving this matter.

By having an alternative system in place whereby owners of commercial properties are requested to complete income and expenditure on the website, as with the GV2000 exercise, would assist in making commercial properties values more accurate. In our opinion, the residential market carries the burden of the budget as commercial properties are not valued correctly.

If commercial properties were valued correctly, monies could be collected more fairly and the burden especially on the lower income nodes could be alleviated to some degree. In agreement with Mr Bam, property prices are too expensive for first time owners and the further burden of overstated rates and taxes makes it almost impossible for first time buyers to enter the market.

In conclusion, the City needs a more effective and transparent attitude to property owners, enabling the city to support property owners rather than hinder them. Making information more freely available to all property owners will bring more clarity and confidence to the property market. The second factor noted in this article is the increase in tariffs. In the defence of the City, the rates and taxes tariffs were decreased with the implementation of the previous General Valuation 2015 effective 01 July 2016. If the municipal valuations increase to the same degree as previously it would be prudent for the City to do the same this time round.

This takes into account the increases foreseen for other costs that include refuse and sewage, that will significantly impact the lower to middle income nodes. In our opinion, The City is treading on thin ice. The increased VAT, increases food and transport, the most significant costs other than housing, places a further burden on property owners. How far is the City prepared to go to justify their increases? The proposed increases are substantially higher than increases in salaries with families living on the breadline already.

In closing, we believe that the City should be building a relationship with property owners as opposed to breaking down communication channels. If people were more informed and privy to the intentions of the City a better relationship could be established with property owners. It can be said that most property owners do not argue with paying property expenses but more so disagree with the exploitation of the money collected.

Explore neighbourhoods mentioned in this article

Cape Town City Bowl
Hip and Happening Hotspot
Living in the CBD of Cape Town is unlike any other city centre. Table Mountain, Lions Head and Signal Hill cradle the City Centre, with mountain hikes and forests in easy access and it is within minutes’ drive to some of the world’s best beaches. Depending on which area in the city you live, the housing arrangements can vary from large leafy houses in Oranjezicht, to small studio apartments in the City Centre. Living in the CBD of Cape Town gives the best of both worlds as you're in close proximity to all amenities, as well as have nature on your doorstep.
Cape Town Southern Suburbs
Affluent Village Feel
The Southern Suburbs make up some of the most popular residential areas in Cape Town. With large plots of land and roomy homes, the area attracts a fairly affluent crowd. The suburbs in the area include Rondebosch, Claremont, Plumstead, Ottery, Wynberg, Newlands, Constantia and Bishopscourt, Pinelands, Observatory, Tokai, Bergvliet, Kenilworth and Steenberg. Peaceful, quiet and leafy, the Southern Suburbs are seen by many as the perfect place to bring up children.
Tableview and Blouberg
Affordable Upmarket Beachfront Living
The Tableview and Blouberg neighbourhood on the Western Seaboard of Cape Town includes the suburbs of Big Bay, Blaauwberg, Bloubergrant, Parklands and Tableview. The area is vibey both day and night. During the day, life revolves around the beach with surfing, stand-up boarding, running and cycling proving popular with locals. At night the numerous pubs, clubs and restaurants buzz with activity. The area is extremely popular with families due to it being child-friendly, having great schools and being affordable, in comparison to other areas in Cape Town.

Related Articles

What lies ahead for residential property this year?
Press | 07 Feb 2018

What lies ahead for residential property this year?

The gradual slowdown in the rate of growth in property prices across the country has left home owners, buyers and investors wondering what could be in store for residential property this year.

How long it takes to sell a house in South Africa currently
Press | 17 Apr 2018

How long it takes to sell a house in South Africa currently

Research has revealed that the average time homes spent on the market decreased in the first three months of this year. This is an encouraging sign that the market is starting to strengthen.

Few South Africans upgrading to better homes
Press | 15 Feb 2018

Few South Africans upgrading to better homes

A recent survey by a leading bank has revealed that homebuyers remain cautious, with a low number selling their homes in order to buy a better one.

sample image of property alerts

Get instant property alerts

Be the first to see property alerts for your area.
;